ISO

This document specifies safety requirements and the means for their verification for driverless industrial trucks (hereafter referred to as trucks) and their systems.Examples of driverless industrial trucks (trucks of ISO 5053-1) can also be known as: "automated guided vehicle", "autonomous mobile robot", "bots", "automated guided cart", "tunnel tugger", "under cart", etc.This document also contains requirements for driverless industrial trucks which are provided with:— automatic modes which either require operators' action(s) to initiate or enable such automatic operations. — the capability to transport one or more riders (which are neither considered as drivers nor as operators). — additional manual modes which allow operators to operate the truck manually; or— a maintenance mode which allows manual operation of truck functions for maintenance reasons.It is not applicable to trucks solely guided by mechanical means (rails, guides, etc.) or to remotely controlled trucks, which are not considered to be driverless trucks.For the purposes of this document, a driverless industrial truck is a powered truck, which is designed to operate automatically. A driverless truck system comprises the control system, which can be part of the truck and/or separate from it, guidance means and power system. Requirements for power sources are not covered in this document.The condition of the operating zone has a significant effect on the safe operation of the driverless industrial truck. The preparations of the operating zone to eliminate the associated hazards are specified in Annex A.This document deals with all significant hazards, hazardous situations or hazardous events during all phases of the life of the truck (ISO 12100:2010, 5.4), as listed in Annex B, relevant to the applicable machines when it is used as intended and under conditions of misuse which are reasonably foreseeable by the manufacturer.It does not give requirements for additional hazards that can occur:— during operation in severe conditions (e.g. extreme climates, freezer applications, strong magnetic fields). — during operation in nuclear environments. — from trucks intended to operate in public zones (in particular ISO 13482). — during operation on a public road. — during operation in potentially explosive environments. — during operation in military applications. — during operation with specific hygienic requirements. — during operation in ionizing radiation environments. — during the transportation of (a) person(s) other than (the) intended rider(s). — when handling loads the nature of which can lead to dangerous situations (e.g. molten metals, acids/bases, radiating materials). — for rider positions with elevation function higher than 1 200 mm from the floor/ground to the platform floor.This document does not contain safety requirements for trailer(s) being towed behind a truck.This document does not contain safety requirements for elevated operator trucks.This document is not applicable to trucks manufactured before the date of its publication.

This document establishes the vocabulary of industrial trucks.For the purposes of this document, industrial trucks are wheeled vehicles having at least three wheels with a powered or non-powered driving mechanism — except those running on rails — which are designed either to carry, tow, push, lift, stack or tier in racks any kind of load, and which are controlled either by an operator or by driverless automation.

This document defines terms in the field of information technology.

ISO/TS 15066:2016 specifies safety requirements for collaborative industrial robot systems and the work environment, and supplements the requirements and guidance on collaborative industrial robot operation given in ISO 10218‑1 and ISO 10218‑2.ISO/TS 15066:2016 applies to industrial robot systems as described in ISO 10218‑1 and ISO 10218‑2. It does not apply to non-industrial robots, although the safety principles presented can be useful to other areas of robotics.NOTE This Technical Specification does not apply to collaborative applications designed prior to its publication

This document covers the general description of benchmarking test piece geometries along with quantitative and qualitative measurements to be taken on the benchmarking test piece(s) to assess the performance of additive manufacturing (AM) systems.This performance assessment may serve the two following purposes:– AM system capability evaluation. – AM system calibration.The benchmarking test piece(s) is (are) primarily used to quantitatively assess the geometric performance of an AM system. This document describes a suite of test geometries, each designed to investigate one or more specific performance metrics and several example configurations of these geometries into test piece(s). It prescribes quantities and qualities of the test geometries to be measured but does not dictate specific measurement methods. Various user applications can require various grades of performance. This document discusses examples of feature configurations, as well as measurement uncertainty requirements, to demonstrate low and high grade examination and performance. This document does not discuss a specific procedure or machine settings for manufacturing a test piece, which are covered by ASTM F2971 and other relevant process specific specifications.

ISO 9409-1:2004 defines the main dimensions, designation and marking for a circular plate as mechanical interface. It is intended to ensure the exchangeability and to keep the orientation of hand-mounted end effectors.It does not define other requirements of the end effector coupling device.It does not contain any correlation of load-carrying ranges, as it is expected that the appropriate interface is selected depending on the application and the load-carrying capacity of the robot.

This document defines terms used in relation to robotics.

ISO 14118:2017 specifies requirements for designed-in means aimed at preventing unexpected machine start-up (see 3.2) to allow safe human interventions in danger zones (see Annex A).ISO 14118:2017 applies to unexpected start-up from all types of energy source, i.e.:- power supply, e.g. electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic. - stored energy due to, e.g. gravity, compressed springs. - external influences, e.g. from wind.ISO 14118:2017 does not specify performance levels or safety integrity levels for safety-related parts of control systems. While available means to prevent unexpected start-up are identified, this document does not specify the means for the prevention of unexpected machine start-up for specific machines.NOTE A type-C standard can define the required means for the prevention of harm arising from unexpected start-up. Otherwise, the requirements for a specific machine need to be determined by risk assessment outside the scope of this document.

ISO 24511:2007, 2.24.Activities relating to drinking water and wastewater services::Guidelines for the management of wastewater utilities and for the assessment of wastewater services

The definitions in this edition of ISO 6107 are based on available standards and aim to harmonise the understanding of terms used within ISO TC147 Water quality to facilitate clear understanding and application of the water quality standards and to reduce variation of interpretation as far as possible. Source information is provided where available. This standard aims to improve and feed the terminology database for ISO TC147 and to serve as a reference document for all water quality characterisation committees and users. Terms and the interpretation thereof may differ in various fields i.e.: chemistry microbiology and ecotoxicology. This is indicated in brackets, if applicable, after the term being defined. ISO 6107 is restricted to definitions for terms which appear in standards of ISO/TC 147, Water quality.

ISO 37101:2016 establishes requirements for a management system for sustainable development in communities, including cities, using a holistic approach, with a view to ensuring consistency with the sustainable development policy of communities. The intended outcomes of a management system for sustainable development in communities include: (a) managing sustainability and fostering smartness and resilience in communities, while taking into account the territorial boundaries to which it applies; (b) improving the contribution of communities to sustainable development outcomes; (c) assessing the performance of communities in progressing towards sustainable development outcomes and the level of smartness and of resilience that they have achieved; (d) fulfilling compliance obligations. ISO 37101:2016 is intended to help communities become more resilient, smart and sustainable, through the implementation of strategies, programmes, projects, plans and services, and demonstrate and communicate their achievements. ISO 37101:2016 is intended to be implemented by an organization designated by a community to establish the organizational framework and to provide the resources necessary to support the management of environmental, economic and social performance outcomes.

ISO 37153:2017 provides the basis, requirements and guidance for a maturity model for the assessment of technical performance, process and interoperability of community infrastructure(s) as well as its contribution to the community, and guidance for future improvements. This document is applicable to a) all types of community infrastructure, including, but not limited to, energy, water, transportation, waste and ICT, b) single types of community infrastructure or multiple types of community infrastructure, and c) all types of communities, regardless of geographical locations, size, economic structure, stage of economic development, and d) all applicable stages of infrastructure life cycle (e.g. planning/design, construction, operation, decommission).NOTE Utilization of natural systems, such as green infrastructure, is also considered as one type of infrastructure