Standard for Child and Student Data Governance
This standard provides stakeholders with certifiable and responsible child and student data governance methodologies.
This standard provides stakeholders with certifiable and responsible child and student data governance methodologies.
This standard defines the performance metrics of cryptocurrency payment between consumers and merchants required to quantify the experience assessment of both consumers and merchants, such as the duration time required to complete a transaction made in cryptocurrency through a general process of cryptocurrency payment.
This standard provides a common framework for distributed ledger technology (DLT) usage, implementation, and interaction in agriculture. The framework maps DLT terms including transactions, smart contracts, tokens, assets and networks to terms in agriculture, and addresses technical aspects including scalability, security and privacy challenges with regard to DLT in agriculture. Concerns from different stakeholders and requirements in horizontal and vertical categories of agriculture are included in the framework.
e-Voting is an application of modern Web and Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) for more choices and security in registration and voting. Choices range from voting with anonymous paper ballots and postal mail, to online voting where an electronic ballot can be authenticated that it was received and recorded as intended. For security, DLT-enabled systems: validate sources with cryptographic methods, secure communications with digital signatures, and confirm valid transaction with a transparent ledger. Suspicious transactions are recorded as part of a private real-time audit and database, and e-Voting can be tailored for the local needs and methods of a country or administrative sub-division.
This standard provides a common framework for blockchain usage, implementation, and interaction with the Internet of Things (IoT). The framework addresses items such as security and privacy challenges with regards to Blockchain in IoT. Blockchain permissioned IoT blockchain, and permission-less IoT blockchain will be included in the framework.
The standard defines the Entity Risk Mutual Assistance Model (RMAM) based on blockchain technology, including the involved entities of interest, the relationship between entities, organizational framework, and design method
This standard provides a common nomenclature and framework for describing blockchain governance across all use cases and contexts, including public, private, permissioned, permissionless, and hybrid. The standard is only normative regarding terminology. It is non-normative with respect to the design of particular blockchain protocols and systems. Where two terms are in common use for one concept, the standard shall define both terms and elaborate on any meaningful distinctions between them.
This standard defines the assessment framework for data compliance, governance and risk management and provides performance metrics such as availability, security, privacy, integrity, continuance, scalability, etc.
This standard defines the functional requirements in data compliance, governance and risk management in the operational process for Blockchain-based IoT data management systems.
This standard defines the risk control requirements for cryptocurrency payment between consumers and merchants. It addresses how to control the risks on related sides and manage the security of fiat money and cryptocurrency in the value transferring process.
A framework of blockchain-based Internet of Things (IoT ) data management is defined in this standard. It identifies the common building blocks of the framework that blockchain enabled during IoT data lifecycle including data acquisition, processing, storage, analyzing, usage/exchange and obsoletion, and the interactions among these building blocks.
This standard defines requirements for multiple aspects of user identification and Anti-Money Laundering on cryptocurrency exchanges, such as KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations, outsourcing proper compliance measures to third-party solutions, and building up a self-regulatory layer of security and accountability among exchanges. It is to keep customers from malignant influence of unethical and illegal money that can be traced back inside/outside the cryptocurrency space. It is different from the IEEE P2140.2 standard, which is based on the protection of customer cryptographic assets.