Standard

This standard is applicable to dry cleaning robots for household use in or under conditions similar to those in households.The purpose of this standard is to specify the essential performance characteristics of dry cleaning robots and to describe methods for measuring these characteristics.This standard is neither concerned with safety nor with performance requirements.

This standard is applicable to dry cleaning robots for household use in or under conditions similar to those in households.The purpose of this standard is to specify the essential performance characteristics of dry cleaning robots and to describe methods for measuring these characteristics.This standard is neither concerned with safety nor with performance requirements.

Scope of document is to identify, select and describe use cases where the IoT data and services require data usability specifications for machines consuming data for AI (for example machine learning). Enabling data usability with AI approach will also be considered. It includes Use Cases pertianing to Robots

This document specifies the necessary system hardware components, the characteristics, the component requirements and conditions for the application of robotic ultrasonic test systems.This document specifies the general requirements and acceptance criteria for robotic ultrasonic test systems.This document is applicable to robotic ultrasonic test systems composed of one or more robot(s).This document is applicable to conventional straight beam probes and immersion technique.This document is also applicable for phased array probes but then additional tests can be necessary.

This document describes methods of specifying and evaluating the manipulation performance of service robots, notably:— grasp size. — grasp strength. — grasp slip resistance. — opening a hinged door; and— opening a sliding door.There are other grasping characteristics and use cases for manipulation of service robots. It is expected that these will be included in a future revision.This document deals with the indoor environment only. However, the depicted tests can also be applicable for robots operating in outdoor environments.This document is not applicable for the verification or validation of safety requirements.

This document provides guidance on the use of ISO 13482 and is intended to facilitate the design of personal care robots in conformity with ISO 13482. Additional guidance is provided for users with limited experience of risk assessment and risk reduction. This document provides clarification and guidance on new terms and safety requirements introduced to allow close human-robot interaction and human-robot contact in personal care robot applications, including mobile servant robots, physical assistant robots and person carrier robots. This document considers the application of ISO 13482 to all service robots and includes related examples.

This document describes methods that can be used to test personal care robots in terms of safety requirements defined in ISO 13482. The target robots of this document are identical to those of ISO 13482.The manufacturer determines the required tests and appropriate testing parameters based on a risk assessment of the robot's design and usage. This risk assessment can determine that tests and test parameters other than those contained in this document are acceptable.Not all test methods are applicable to all robot types. Test methods labelled "universal" are applicable to all personal care robots. For other tests, the heading states for which robot types the test can be applied (e.g. "for wearable robot" or "for mobile robot").Some test methods can be replaced by using other applicable standards, even if they are not listed in this document.

IEC TR 60601-4-1:2017(E) is intended to help a manufacturer through the key decisions and steps to be taken to perform a detailed risk management and usability engineering processes for medical electrical equipment or a medical electrical system, hereafter referred to as MEE or MES, employing a degree of autonomy (DOA). This document provides a definition of DOA of MEE or MES and a medical robot, and also provides guidance on: - methodologies to perform the risk management process and usability engineering for an MEE or MES with a DOA; - considerations of basic safety and essential performance for an MEE and MES with a DOA; and - identifying the use of DOA, and similar concepts in existing ISO/IEC standards dealing with MEE or MES with the goal to facilitate alignment of standards by consistent use of the concept of DOA; and - distinguishing between medical robots, and other MEE and MES. Unless specified otherwise, this document considers MEE and MES together. The manufacturer of an MEE or MES with a DOA is expected to design and manufacture an MEE or MES that fulfils its intended use and does not have unacceptable risk throughout its life-cycle. This document provides guidance to help the manufacturer in complying with the requirements of IEC 60601-1:2005 and IEC 60601-1:2005/AMD1:2012 for MEE and MES with DOA. The document is also intended as guidance for future standard writers. There are no prerequisites to this document.

This protocol can be used to validate the weight support level for Weight Support Systems used in the healthcare domain, where the amount of weight support can be varied by a therapist according to the need for the therapy of a subject .

This protocol can be used to validate the weight support level for Weight Support Systems used in the healthcare domain, where the amount of weight support can be varied by a therapist according to the need for the therapy of a subject.

This protocol can be used to validate the ability of a Weight Support System, used in the healthcare domain, to prevent falls by limiting the Range of Vertical Motion.

This protocol is to be used to test the restraining energy that can be applied to a human subject during use of an exoskeleton used for upper limb support. This protocol is both aimed at exoskeletons used in the medical domain as well as at exoskeletons used in the industrial, logistic or agricultural domain.