Other IT standards

This document specifies the elements, among those defined in CMS digital signatures and CAdES digital signatures that enable verification of a digital signature over a long period of time.
It does not give new technical specifications about the digital signature itself, nor new restrictions of usage of the technical specifications about the digital signatures which have already existed.
NOTE CAdES digital signature is the extended specification of Cryptographic message syntax (CMS), used widely.

This document specifies the elements, among those defined in XAdES digital signatures, that enable verification of a digital signature over a long period of time.
It does not give new technical specifications about the digital signature itself, nor new restrictions of usage of the technical specifications about the digital signatures which already exist.
NOTE XAdES digital signatures is the widely-used extended specification of “XML-Signature Syntax and Processing”.

This document establishes a framework for identification and authentication systems. It provides recommendations and best practice that include:

— management and verification of identifiers;

— physical representation of identifiers;

— participants’ due diligence;

— vetting of all participants within the system;

— relationship between the unique identifier (UID) and possible authentication elements related to it;

— questions that deal with the identification of the inspector and any authorized access to privileged information about the object;

— inspector access history (logs).

The model described in this document is intended to determine the common functions of different systems.

This document describes processes, functions and functional units of a generic model. It does not specify any specific technical solutions.

Object identification systems can incorporate other functions and features such as supply chain traceability, quality traceability, marketing activities and others, but these aspects are out of scope of this document.

NOTE This document does not refer to industry-specific requirements such as GS1 Global Trade Item Number (GTIN).

ISO 14533-3:2017 specifies the elements, among those defined in PDF Advanced Electronic Signatures (PAdES), that enable verification of a digital signature over a long period of time.
It does not give new technical specifications about the digital signature itself, nor new restrictions of usage of the technical specifications about the digital signatures which already exist.

This document specifies three business requirements for the visibility of logistics traffic flow based on the use cases and gap analysis in Annex A. It includes
1) LISS network architecture requirements,
2) visibility data interchange requirements between LISSs, and
3) visibility data interface and process requirements for an LISS network.
These three business requirements are described further in Clause 6, Clause 7 and Clause 8 respectively.
Furthermore, Clause 8 describes the requirement for a guideline for business participants and stakeholders in an LISS network such as logistics information service providers, single window/SSP operators, data providers and logistics data users.
This document does not include standardization
1) at the level of logistics devices (areas of standardisation covered by ISO/TC 104, ISO/TC 204),
2) for ships, navigation and marine technologies (areas of standardisation covered by ISO/TC 8), or
3) related to international data exchange such as standards developed, published and maintained by UN/CEFACT, GS1, WCO which are referenced as appropriate in this document.

This document gives guidelines for establishing interoperability among independently functioning product identification and related authentication systems, as described in ISO 16678. The permanent transfer of data from one system to another is out of the scope of this document.

It also gives guidance on how to specify an environment open to existing or new methods of identification and authentication of objects, and which is accessible for legacy systems that may need to remain active.

It is applicable to any industry, stakeholder or user group requiring object identification and authentication systems. It can be used on a global scale, or in limited environments. This document supports those involved in planning and establishing interoperation.

This document gives guidelines for performance criteria and an evaluation methodology for authentication solutions that aim to unambiguously establish material good authenticity and integrity throughout an entire material good's life cycle. It focuses on the authentication of a material good and, if appropriate, its components, parts and related data:

— covered by intellectual property rights;

— covered by relevant international, regional or national regulations;

— with counterfeiting-related implications;

— otherwise with a distinctive identity.

This document is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations that require the ability to validate the authenticity and integrity of material goods. It will help organizations to determine the categories of authentication elements they need in order to combat counterfeiting-related risks, and the criteria for selecting authentication elements, after having undertaken a counterfeiting risk assessment.

Authentication solutions can be used in areas such as anti-counterfeiting, prevention of product fraud and prevention of diversion.

This document does not specify economic criteria aiming to correlate performance and costs of the authentication solutions.

This document establishes a framework for a trustworthy environment for information processing and communication that protects integrity along the supply chain of physical and related electronic documents, products, software and services life cycle to mitigate product fraud and counterfeit goods, by using object identification techniques.

This document gives guidelines to establish a framework for ensuring trust, interoperability and interoperation via secure and reliable electronically signed encoded data set (ESEDS) schemes for multi-actor applications which are even applicable in multi-sector environment.

This document does not interfere with existing traceability and identification and authentication systems but is able to support interoperations between them by introducing an ESEDS scheme.

This document specifies a process to qualify the suitability, reliability and effectiveness of artefact metrics as well as artefact metric recognition principles for identification and verification.

The artefact metric recognition described in this document can be used to identify or verify artefacts using one or more measurements of their characteristics, each of which is unique to an individual artefact and is supposedly impossible to reproduce.

This document is applicable to artefact metrics throughout the life cycle processes of products.

Measurement of the resilience of the system where the distinguishing characteristic is degraded is out of the scope of this document.

This document is applicable to performance testing of artefact metric systems and algorithms through analysis of the comparison scores and decisions output by the system, without requiring detailed knowledge of the system’s algorithms or of the underlying distribution of characteristics in the objects of interest.

This document excludes performance testing where deliberate attacks undermine the artefact metric system.

This document specifies the Visible Digital Seal (VDS) data structure. The document also specifies possible forms of representation, generation and verification processes applicable to Visible Digital Seals. This document contains support for future types of data encoding. All formats and processes are irrespective of the documents or objects they relate to. This document does not establish the requirements to implement and deploy VDSs, nor the detailed Response Formatting Functions (RFF).

This document will provide guidance for developing, implementing, monitoring and improving infrastructure resilience in order to help ensure the continuity and effective outcomes of critical services. It can be used by any level of government, institutions, donors, infrastructure regulators, investors and owners, designers and contractors, service providers and international organizations.

This document provides an overview and general principles of a digital twin framework for manufacturing including:
— terms and definitions;
— requirements of the digital twin framework for manufacturing.